Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] Provide in-kernel headers to make extending kernel easier
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] Provide in-kernel headers to make extending kernel easier
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 11:31:11 -0700
- Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, qais.yousef@xxxxxxx, dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ast@xxxxxxxxxx, atishp04@xxxxxxxxx, dancol@xxxxxxxxxx, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Guenter Roeck <groeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>, karim.yaghmour@xxxxxxxxxxx, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, kernel-team@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-trace-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx, rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>, yhs@xxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20190320163116.39275-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
- References: <20190320163116.39275-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:31:14 -0400 "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Introduce in-kernel headers and other artifacts which are made available
> as an archive through proc (/proc/kheaders.tar.xz file).
Lazyass here hasn't been following the recent review discussion and is
going to try cheating. Are there significant outstanding concerns now,
or are we good to go?
[Index of Archives]
[Linux USB Development]
[Linux USB Development]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite Hiking]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
