On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 17:55:32 -0800
Tony Jones <tonyj@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Fix buffer overflow observed when running perf test.
>
> The overflow is when trying to evaluate "1ULL << (64 - 1)" which
> is resulting in -9223372036854775808 which overflows the 20 character
> buffer.
>
> If is possible this bug has been reported before but I still don't
> see any fix checked in:
>
> See: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-perf-users/msg07714.html
>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-perf-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Jones <tonyj@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
I have to say I've let this slide and it is not the first time a patch
went out with this fix. But this one has the correct fix because we
should use a buffer with a multiple of 4. Anyway, Tony I believe was
the first to report this anyway.
For reference we have:
I first heard about Tony's complaint on a post to linux-perf-users on Jan 18.
But then we had after that:
Michael Sartain reported it on 1/24 (and fixed by Tzvetomir)
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-devel/20190125102014.19600-1-tstoyanov@xxxxxxxxxx/
It was later fixed again by Mathias Krause
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-devel/20190223122404.21137-1-minipli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
But since Tony was first to report it, and we discussed that it should
be 24 bytes, I would say this is the patch to take.
Again, sorry for not getting this acknowledged earlier and everyone doing
the same thing multiple times. :-/
Arnaldo, please take this patch. But also add:
Reported-by: Michael Sartain <mikesart@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
-- Steve
> ---
> tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c index abd4fa5d3088..87494c7c619d
> 100644 --- a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> @@ -2457,7 +2457,7 @@ static int arg_num_eval(struct tep_print_arg
> *arg, long long *val) static char *arg_eval (struct tep_print_arg
> *arg) {
> long long val;
> - static char buf[20];
> + static char buf[24];
>
> switch (arg->type) {
> case TEP_PRINT_ATOM:
|