The modification of the last bin of the model makes no sense (this is
my mistake). The comment above the code that is doing this modification
is partially correct, however it speaks about increasing the size of
the last bin, while the code below the comment changes the lower edge
of this bin. The actual increase of the size of the last bin is done in
ksmodel_set_upper_edge() where the lower edge of the Upper Overflow bin
gets shifted (max + 1). This effectively increases the size of the last bin.
Reported-by: Tzvetomir Stoyanov <tstoyanov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: f97e31f00 ("kernel-shark-qt: Introduce the visualization model ..")
Signed-off-by: Yordan Karadzhov <ykaradzhov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel-shark/src/libkshark-model.c | 9 ---------
1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel-shark/src/libkshark-model.c b/kernel-shark/src/libkshark-model.c
index b6d3612..4bd1e2c 100644
--- a/kernel-shark/src/libkshark-model.c
+++ b/kernel-shark/src/libkshark-model.c
@@ -266,15 +266,6 @@ static void ksmodel_set_next_bin_edge(struct kshark_trace_histo *histo,
/* Calculate the beginning of the next bin. */
time = histo->min + next_bin * histo->bin_size;
- /*
- * The timestamp of the very last entry of the dataset can be exactly
- * equal to the value of the upper edge of the range. This is very
- * likely to happen when we use ksmodel_set_in_range_bining(). In this
- * case we have to increase the size of the very last bin in order to
- * make sure that the last entry of the dataset will fall into it.
- */
- if (next_bin == histo->n_bins - 1)
- ++time;
/*
* Find the index of the first entry inside
* the next bin (timestamp > time).
--
2.17.1
|