On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:10:48AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 09:15:05AM -0000, tip-bot2 for Namhyung Kim wrote: > > The following commit has been merged into the perf/urgent branch of tip: > > > > Commit-ID: b0be17d8108bf3448a58be319d085155a128cf3a > > Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/b0be17d8108bf3448a58be319d085155a128cf3a > > Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> > > AuthorDate: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 01:10:58 -07:00 > > Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > CommitterDate: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:04:31 +01:00 > > > > perf/x86: Check data address for IBS software filter > > > > The IBS software filter is filtering kernel samples for regular users in > > PMI handler. It checks the instruction address in the IBS register to > > determine if it was in the kernel mode or not. > > > > But it turns out that it's possible to report a kernel data address even > > if the instruction address belongs to the user space. Matteo Rizzo > > found that when an instruction raises an exception, IBS can report some > > kernel data address like IDT while holding the faulting instruction's > > RIP. To prevent an information leak, it should double check if the data > > address in PERF_SAMPLE_DATA is in the kernel space as well. > > > > Suggested-by: Matteo Rizzo <matteorizzo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250317081058.1794729-1-namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx > > --- > > arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c | 7 +++++++ > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c > > index e7a8b87..24985c7 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c > > @@ -1147,6 +1147,13 @@ fail: > > if (perf_ibs == &perf_ibs_op) > > perf_ibs_parse_ld_st_data(event->attr.sample_type, &ibs_data, &data); > > > > + if ((event->attr.config2 & IBS_SW_FILTER_MASK) && > > + (event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR) && > > + event->attr.exclude_kernel && !access_ok(data.addr)) { > > + throttle = perf_event_account_interrupt(event); > > + goto out; > > + } > > Did anyone build this? Oops, sorry about this. I fixed it locally but sent the one before adding the change. Will send v2. Thanks, Namhyung > > arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c: In function ‘perf_ibs_handle_irq’: > arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c:1291:63: error: macro "access_ok" requires 2 arguments, but only 1 given > 1291 | event->attr.exclude_kernel && !access_ok(data.addr)) { > | ^ > In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h:25, > from ./include/linux/uaccess.h:12, > from ./include/linux/sched/task.h:13, > from ./include/linux/sched/signal.h:9, > from ./include/linux/ptrace.h:7, > from ./include/uapi/asm-generic/bpf_perf_event.h:4, > from ./arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm/bpf_perf_event.h:1, > from ./include/uapi/linux/bpf_perf_event.h:11, > from ./include/linux/perf_event.h:18, > from arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c:9: > ./include/asm-generic/access_ok.h:45: note: macro "access_ok" defined here > 45 | #define access_ok(addr, size) likely(__access_ok(addr, size)) > | > arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c:1291:44: error: ‘access_ok’ undeclared (first use in this function) > 1291 | event->attr.exclude_kernel && !access_ok(data.addr)) { > | ^~~~~~~~~ > arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c:1291:44: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:207: arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.o] Error 1 > make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:465: arch/x86/events/amd] Error 2 > make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:465: arch/x86/events] Error 2 > make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:465: arch/x86] Error 2 > make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > make[1]: *** [/mnt/kernel/kernel/6th/linux/Makefile:1997: .] Error 2 > make: *** [Makefile:251: __sub-make] Error 2 > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
![]() |