Hi Gautham, On 2024-10-25, 09:44, "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@xxxxxxx <mailto:gautham.shenoy@xxxxxxx>> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 07:12:49PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Sat, 2024-10-19 at 02:30 +0000, Prundeanu, Cristian wrote: > > > > > > The hammerdb test is a bit more complex than sysbench. It uses two > > > independent physical machines to perform a TPC-C derived test [1], aiming > > > to simulate a real-world database workload. The machines are allocated as > > > an AWS EC2 instance pair on the same cluster placement group [2], to avoid > > > measuring network bottlenecks instead of server performance. The SUT > > > instance runs mysql configured to use 2 worker threads per vCPU (32 > > > total); the load generator instance runs hammerdb configured with 64 > > > virtual users and 24 warehouses [3]. Each test consists of multiple > > > 20-minute rounds, run consecutively on multiple independent instance > > > pairs. > > > > Would it be possible to produce something that Prateek and Gautham > > (Hi Gautham btw !) can easily consume to reproduce ? > > > > Maybe a container image or a pair of container images hammering each > > other ? (the simpler the better). > > Yes, that would be useful. Please share your recipe. We will try and > reproduce it at our end. In our testing from a few months ago (some of > which was presented at OSPM 2024), most of the database related > regressions that we observed with EEVDF went away after running these > the server threads under SCHED_BATCH. I am working on a repro package that is self contained and as simple to share as possible. My testing with SCHED_BATCH is meanwhile concluded. It did reduce the regression to less than half - but only with WAKEUP_PREEMPTION enabled. When using NO_WAKEUP_PREEMPTION, there was no performance change compared to SCHED_OTHER. (At the risk of stating the obvious, using SCHED_BATCH only to get back to the default CFS performance is still only a workaround, just as disabling PLACE_LAG+RUN_TO_PARITY is; these give us more room to investigate the root cause in EEVDF, but shouldn't be seen as viable alternate solutions.) Do you have more detail on the database regressions you saw a few months ago? What was the magnitude, and which workloads did it manifest on? -Cristian