On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 01:53:05PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:36:43PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote: > > I guess my issue is that the "Massage commit message" seems to document > > a criticism that the author was careless, didn't follow a rule, or that > > the commit message was defective in some way, with the author having no > > right of reply (at least, not recorded in the git history). > > Not necessarily - that's what you said. I massage commit messages because they > need some touch ups sometimes. > > In your case I rewrote the sentence with "we" because "we" is ambiguous in That _was_ unintentional, so apologies for that. > commit messages. I also broke up this biggish paragraph into smaller chunks to > make it more readable. > > > I may just be being too touchy. > > > > Anyway, thanks for picking up the patch -- I'm not trying to make extra > > work for anyone. > > I look at it this way: I don't always agree with other maintainers' choices > either but this is the reality: every maintainer has their own > requirements/views/etc on how the code and commit messages are going to look, > yadda yadda. And to some extent that's their prerogative. > > But we have a *lot* *bigger* fish to fry so I'm going to stop debating here as > everything was already said. > > Thx. > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette > Ack; apologies for the noise. Cheers ---Dave
|