Re: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/topology/amd: Evaluate SMT in CPUID leaf 0x8000001e only on family 0x17 and greater
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/topology/amd: Evaluate SMT in CPUID leaf 0x8000001e only on family 0x17 and greater
- From: Christian Heusel <christian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 14:21:28 +0200
- Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20240530085914.GAZlg_4lcZIaa83jVb@fat_crate.local>
- References: <7skhx6mwe4hxiul64v6azhlxnokheorksqsdbp7qw6g2jduf6c@7b5pvomauugk> <171697474837.10875.6335609575452053884.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> <2gj2lkahha4wzyf2ol6xk2ermrmsxaklznrisixdg4m3ogzten@gbrtiyjebeup> <20240530085914.GAZlg_4lcZIaa83jVb@fat_crate.local>
- Ui-outboundreport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:3pKsS524UNg=;vn276BggOWYLHFFQPpUCGhVVp8G BgBw66xJROmpHa0Q56pN3n/7QsUQXzt/10uezS7aqXDZ0JEKys1B3I6rUE/WyCGJtEIWa6BBH XABTaNwBlVDWL6j3x2BmdEx9rOAL/5SdST6gDz24QMegXFc4D+JvlCjbKU3kXi3Y3A5ctl3BY JsronITgfPJel69juz7eLhAE0mxj8eaVxrXMJNHHi2HE8Ek5mDPOnpi/3VARxsxKiv5EUCrlW qHC2tsWRah2mVYwmv7TGs2F3mlL/XM9Ca2YGc3tX0XHeIKlWAZZ8rc72hWlEw6WDPaYwdmjTA NANlrQQZHMP+8vVviWZL+kIAUFppd5wCEhYV3rveWLU4c1ejhkHSRD3nEtaBJx98AWOQfDtFm VgHUkFjtZYa7E0t0kk0sI42208DCYe+3X2xT3wrupMekAziyACxBjyS/i0kx6U6lP1kUBMHeW OcuTY9930jIKJEZC5PIIJ8FIoSc+xbaMBTq4ZslgBuO0xUyqr/5y3+Z0F3mDnWwnoYR9zsxHn ZI8aQPWLeEMESJbkNIHdc4YphBeqGJKO/wbHbd6FZtRjO5bCMIpDlxnyl5zfcbopO4fBMxCVI VIZ5SUwV/8gyMghF4ihm8Ny8J0fxBZWq2VIdJOH0kxruloKUifMgnB/S0t70povTW+BIhfytC PJ7CbjE6d4hjNM1JWRQImK1WmhAzg3UYwIfAP4kaalSMNLK4b9eoYMd4eD4h/RswWJNB5BJAh exd6rBbMBkDw2NtwELquBzoLH9qvxxkwfwk5Jd4+hozRoR4iuoPcW4=
On 24/05/30 10:59AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 12:40:50AM +0200, Christian Heusel wrote:
> > it seems like somehow the patch has lost the following two trailers
> > compared to the list variant[0] while being applied:
> >
> > Bisected-by: Christian Heusel <christian@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Did that happen on purpose or did some scripts fail?
>
> Well, we don't add unknown tags because it was getting unwieldy and
> Bisected-by is not really one we do. I can offer
>
> Reported-by: Christian Heusel <christian@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> as bisection is important work and it should be documented.
>
> How does that sound?
Sounds good! I thought it was a thing because I saw it used in a few
places, i.e. here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?id=e37617c8e53a1f7fcba6d5e1041f4fd8a2425c27
I'll keep it in mind for future bug reports! :)
Have a nice week,
Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Stable Commits]
[Linux Stable Kernel]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Video &Media]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]