[tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Rework sched_use_asym_prio() and sched_asym_prefer()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     45de20623475049c424bc0b89f42efca54995edd
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/45de20623475049c424bc0b89f42efca54995edd
Author:        Alex Shi <alexs@xxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate:    Sat, 10 Feb 2024 19:39:21 +08:00
Committer:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitterDate: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 15:43:17 +01:00

sched/fair: Rework sched_use_asym_prio() and sched_asym_prefer()

sched_use_asym_prio() and sched_asym_prefer() are used together in various
places. Consolidate them into a single function sched_asym().

The existing sched_asym() function is only used when collecting statistics
of a scheduling group. Rename it as sched_group_asym(), and remove the
obsolete function description.

This makes the code easier to read. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alexs@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240210113924.1130448-3-alexs@xxxxxxxxxx
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 300d1bf..475e2ca 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9750,8 +9750,18 @@ static bool sched_use_asym_prio(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
 	return sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY || is_core_idle(cpu);
 }
 
+static inline bool sched_asym(struct sched_domain *sd, int dst_cpu, int src_cpu)
+{
+	/*
+	 * First check if @dst_cpu can do asym_packing load balance. Only do it
+	 * if it has higher priority than @src_cpu.
+	 */
+	return sched_use_asym_prio(sd, dst_cpu) &&
+		sched_asym_prefer(dst_cpu, src_cpu);
+}
+
 /**
- * sched_asym - Check if the destination CPU can do asym_packing load balance
+ * sched_group_asym - Check if the destination CPU can do asym_packing balance
  * @env:	The load balancing environment
  * @sgs:	Load-balancing statistics of the candidate busiest group
  * @group:	The candidate busiest group
@@ -9759,34 +9769,21 @@ static bool sched_use_asym_prio(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
  * @env::dst_cpu can do asym_packing if it has higher priority than the
  * preferred CPU of @group.
  *
- * SMT is a special case. If we are balancing load between cores, @env::dst_cpu
- * can do asym_packing balance only if all its SMT siblings are idle. Also, it
- * can only do it if @group is an SMT group and has exactly on busy CPU. Larger
- * imbalances in the number of CPUS are dealt with in find_busiest_group().
- *
- * If we are balancing load within an SMT core, or at PKG domain level, always
- * proceed.
- *
  * Return: true if @env::dst_cpu can do with asym_packing load balance. False
  * otherwise.
  */
 static inline bool
-sched_asym(struct lb_env *env, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs, struct sched_group *group)
+sched_group_asym(struct lb_env *env, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs, struct sched_group *group)
 {
-	/* Ensure that the whole local core is idle, if applicable. */
-	if (!sched_use_asym_prio(env->sd, env->dst_cpu))
-		return false;
-
 	/*
-	 * CPU priorities does not make sense for SMT cores with more than one
+	 * CPU priorities do not make sense for SMT cores with more than one
 	 * busy sibling.
 	 */
-	if (group->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY) {
-		if (sgs->group_weight - sgs->idle_cpus != 1)
-			return false;
-	}
+	if ((group->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY) &&
+	    (sgs->group_weight - sgs->idle_cpus != 1))
+		return false;
 
-	return sched_asym_prefer(env->dst_cpu, group->asym_prefer_cpu);
+	return sched_asym(env->sd, env->dst_cpu, group->asym_prefer_cpu);
 }
 
 /* One group has more than one SMT CPU while the other group does not */
@@ -9942,7 +9939,7 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
 	/* Check if dst CPU is idle and preferred to this group */
 	if (!local_group && env->sd->flags & SD_ASYM_PACKING &&
 	    env->idle != CPU_NOT_IDLE && sgs->sum_h_nr_running &&
-	    sched_asym(env, sgs, group)) {
+	    sched_group_asym(env, sgs, group)) {
 		sgs->group_asym_packing = 1;
 	}
 
@@ -11028,8 +11025,7 @@ static struct rq *find_busiest_queue(struct lb_env *env,
 		 * SMT cores with more than one busy sibling.
 		 */
 		if ((env->sd->flags & SD_ASYM_PACKING) &&
-		    sched_use_asym_prio(env->sd, i) &&
-		    sched_asym_prefer(i, env->dst_cpu) &&
+		    sched_asym(env->sd, i, env->dst_cpu) &&
 		    nr_running == 1)
 			continue;
 
@@ -11899,8 +11895,7 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
 		 * preferred CPU must be idle.
 		 */
 		for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_domain_span(sd), nohz.idle_cpus_mask) {
-			if (sched_use_asym_prio(sd, i) &&
-			    sched_asym_prefer(i, cpu)) {
+			if (sched_asym(sd, i, cpu)) {
 				flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
 				goto unlock;
 			}




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Stable Commits]     [Linux Stable Kernel]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Video &Media]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux