Re: [PATCH] tick/nohz: Update comments some more

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>]

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > + * infrastructure actually relies on the tick itself as a backend in
> > + * low-resolution mode (see hrtimer_run_queues()).
> > + *
> > + * This low-resolution handler still makes use of some hrtimer APIs meanwhile
> > + * for commodity with expiration calculation and forwarding.
> 
> commodity?

I presume 'commonality' was intended here?

Thanks,

	Ingo