Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Do not wakeup-preempt same-prio SCHED_OTHER tasks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Do not wakeup-preempt same-prio SCHED_OTHER tasks
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 11:48:18 +0200
Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@xxxxxxx>, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@xxxxxxxxx>, Gautham Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <ZQljoiSBhZLEFI/G@gmail.com>
References: <20230816134059.GC982867@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <169228500414.27769.13366308319134164264.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> <21f3d376-17d6-8fb6-5f35-507ea931c0d3@amd.com> <02f6a15f094adb3c8d9957b031941d6bd10c2e43.camel@gmx.de> <f0859f35-39ec-e5dc-b77a-79162516de31@amd.com> <0e153dd25900af70f91e4a73f960320e6daf3c6a.camel@gmx.de> <ZQljoiSBhZLEFI/G@gmail.com>
Ui-outboundreport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:APciL2NUABU=;Oi5zvvD3gtCH2LA/eaFz4SMzUjX yANLWNIRRdBvbl8Iptd35btU9qjLijPtjnfGA3jHNkgZh4c7KZL5Rxj3RTZJojVtXT9tyStRV q0273oGPnssf3cFdBS6IZiaAM15uTgs66zwS6JpLryppY3yjudtu8UDDrxWNK4TPsxCCPepyj 2P5IY64DP72F9D/YpB8lUSBTurupqLbTBq2fTi76tD6wD7U8zvUcm7bGGkyRBjmEOfA9VU/qa bRGVmjhrGumn1GnWd+KVL0BR/p+TtLC/qB5KVeGQ8fTrHMeMCZzausyRM1/1d+z7QEsOukJVy GydAGzHYE7u9L4VdFd1mRLPlVeHkCqRbvf8N8uVsT5kywENFPUC2lJV6bzckxY+2H0Z8eqFpc LS+z4AlkLPrGrcxFAlkSD/L9vPeQog3RBGESYqfBBsQ2m//LZyGXJklBvt0vOqpilNbJmROyV KjhFfYHv1yu9s61JBgiyAUpbdORVIScJpLwUXRk1AqtvtdPMSpCBFs2/ZvL8LTdUVRQocLBOY uFRSv/cPJHuC+9u/4mEorCluNiMia6owYTMVIR28mccSEZHcOCGEXWvoaq+oA8I2EW1Xm6r4L lWMnssXoiEyBoEAhYGj6hVaHF1JExwR65a9ClArXWfVAoMultWKj5FtCJGoXypg6qv5y64Us+ hZdBaYXW2RTcbDFVbkcVcBMhsOY5r0q6J/L8/ONrc4pNR9CQb3QHb63KGO5wdJ23nBnjWPCDS IOdPe8WE+2jSOXfrvUVp07MnXPZaPQK8QJsapYU+19IQpfkYO+RwA8j9wheFQukgy9v+g+Zn9 K/FLHvU1ZnK7kv0TG14t5CTWYxfhQZJqTx8sKdDgk4dA0VY0mMISXp5X1NPE+25Fi/Nfd1py2 r6wIAA1ICSMcwX4Nu+1s21B0pYZQFZ8U2OTZwDY4Gl5DNKJPqBAFBkv+MThAl99sOX8K7JIRg 6kLBmfuiZ9gkd22BY/L24c0+kLY=
User-agent: Evolution 3.42.4

On Tue, 2023-09-19 at 11:02 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> BTW., if overscheduling is still an issue...

The trouble I had with overscheduling was mostly about annoying insta-
preempt creating useless overhead, and that the RUN_TO_PARITY thing
ended. All I see now is the expected 60/40 indeed != 50/50, so things
are gonna shift a bit.

Most of the testing I've done lately has been due to fretting over the
desktop perhaps getting the short end of that shift, but after much
poking and prodding, everything seems just fine here.

	-Mike

References:
- [tip: sched/core] sched/eevdf: Curb wakeup-preemption
  - From: tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [tip: sched/core] sched/eevdf: Curb wakeup-preemption
  - From: K Prateek Nayak
- Re: [tip: sched/core] sched/eevdf: Curb wakeup-preemption
  - From: Mike Galbraith
- Re: [tip: sched/core] sched/eevdf: Curb wakeup-preemption
  - From: K Prateek Nayak
- Re: [tip: sched/core] sched/eevdf: Curb wakeup-preemption
  - From: Mike Galbraith
- [PATCH] sched/fair: Do not wakeup-preempt same-prio SCHED_OTHER tasks
  - From: Ingo Molnar

Prev by Date: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/srso: Set CPUID feature bits independently of bug or mitigation status
Next by Date: [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Rename check_preempt_curr() to wakeup_preempt()
Previous by thread: [PATCH] sched/fair: Do not wakeup-preempt same-prio SCHED_OTHER tasks
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Do not wakeup-preempt same-prio SCHED_OTHER tasks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Stable Commits] [Linux Stable Kernel] [Linux Kernel] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Video &Media] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI]