Re: [tip: x86/urgent] objtool/x86: Fix SRSO mess

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [tip: x86/urgent] objtool/x86: Fix SRSO mess
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 13:31:52 -0700
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20230816115921.GH980931@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20230814121148.704502245@infradead.org> <169217251760.27769.15304146275480287222.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> <20230816115921.GH980931@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 01:59:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Turns out I forgot to build with FRAME_POINTER=y, that still gives:
> 
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: srso_untrain_ret+0xd: call without frame pointer save/setup
> 
> the below seems to cure this.

LGTM

-- 
Josh

Follow-Ups:
- [PATCH] objtool/x86: Fixup frame-pointer vs rethunk
  - From: Peter Zijlstra

References:
- [tip: x86/urgent] objtool/x86: Fix SRSO mess
  - From: tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [tip: x86/urgent] objtool/x86: Fix SRSO mess
  - From: Peter Zijlstra

Prev by Date: Re: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/cpu: Clean up SRSO return thunk mess
Next by Date: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/cpu: Cleanup the untrain mess
Previous by thread: Re: [tip: x86/urgent] objtool/x86: Fix SRSO mess
Next by thread: [PATCH] objtool/x86: Fixup frame-pointer vs rethunk
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Stable Commits] [Linux Stable Kernel] [Linux Kernel] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Video &Media] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux