On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 09:24:13PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:58:39AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > but it obviously gets fixed by commit a3fd3ac0a605 ("x86/cpu: Rename
> > srso_(.*)_alias to srso_alias_\1") so it is probably fine. I only
> > noticed it because I cherry-picked the first five changes to my patched
> > -next tree.
>
> Gah, and I meant to merge that hunk into the right one when fixing the
> 32-bit builds.
Heh, fixups are always hard to get right across multiple patches, been
there, done that...
> So how did you trigger it? You do builds of every patch? Because that's
> the !CONFIG_CPU_SRSO case.
Just ARCH=i386 allmodconfig. CONFIG_CPU_SRSO depends on X86_64 so I
guess that is how it got triggered. I did not build between every patch,
just this one (since it should fix the runtime warning folks have been
noticing) and the final one (as I reported earlier).
> Oh well, lemme rebase and fix it.
>
> Thx for letting me know.
No problem, hopefully most of the hard work around SRSO is behind us :)
Cheers,
Nathan
|