On 2023-06-23 00:16:35 [-0700], John Johansen wrote: > With that said the patch does work, and seems to be stable in the broader > testing it has gotten. Its more complicated than I would like, and wanted to > play with ideas around improving it. I also wanted get some better benchmark data. > All things I just haven't had time for If you tell me what to do (as in run this) I could try to run it on a machine. The current version, your proposal and kmalloc() instead. > I am also not opposed to using some version of this patch now, to solve the > immediate needs and working to improve it after the fact. Sebastian
|