On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 10:06:14AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 07:16:18PM -0000, tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > @@ -753,14 +771,14 @@ static int arch_timer_set_next_event_phys(unsigned long evt, > > return 0; > > } > > > > -static u64 arch_counter_get_cnt_mem(struct arch_timer *t, int offset_lo) > > +static noinstr u64 arch_counter_get_cnt_mem(struct arch_timer *t, int offset_lo) > > { > > u32 cnt_lo, cnt_hi, tmp_hi; > > > > do { > > - cnt_hi = readl_relaxed(t->base + offset_lo + 4); > > - cnt_lo = readl_relaxed(t->base + offset_lo); > > - tmp_hi = readl_relaxed(t->base + offset_lo + 4); > > + cnt_hi = __raw_readl(t->base + offset_lo + 4); > > + cnt_lo = __raw_readl(t->base + offset_lo); > > + tmp_hi = __raw_readl(t->base + offset_lo + 4); > > } while (cnt_hi != tmp_hi); > > > > return ((u64) cnt_hi << 32) | cnt_lo; > > Mark noted that this looses the byteswap :/ > > > --- > Subject: arm64/arch_timer: Fix MMIO byteswap > > The readl_relaxed() to __raw_readl() change meant to loose the > instrumentation, but also (inadvertently) lost the byteswap. > > Fixes: 24ee7607b286 ("arm64/arch_timer: Provide noinstr sched_clock_read() functions") > Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c > index b23d23b033cc..e733a2a1927a 100644 > --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c > @@ -776,9 +776,9 @@ static noinstr u64 arch_counter_get_cnt_mem(struct arch_timer *t, int offset_lo) > u32 cnt_lo, cnt_hi, tmp_hi; > > do { > - cnt_hi = __raw_readl(t->base + offset_lo + 4); > - cnt_lo = __raw_readl(t->base + offset_lo); > - tmp_hi = __raw_readl(t->base + offset_lo + 4); > + cnt_hi = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(t->base + offset_lo + 4)); > + cnt_lo = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(t->base + offset_lo)); > + tmp_hi = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(t->base + offset_lo + 4)); > } while (cnt_hi != tmp_hi); This LGTM, so FWIW: Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> Longer term it'd be good to have noistr-safe forms of the MMIO accessors, but from a quick play that's a much bigger piece of work, and I think this is fine for now! Thanks, Mark.