Re: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/sgx: Set active memcg prior to shmem allocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Just what I think looks like a discrepancy I noticed while merging
tip/master:

On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 06:27:08PM -0000, tip-bot2 for Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h
> index d44e737..332ef35 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h
> @@ -103,10 +103,13 @@ static inline int sgx_encl_find(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>  int sgx_encl_may_map(struct sgx_encl *encl, unsigned long start,
>  		     unsigned long end, unsigned long vm_flags);
>  
> +bool current_is_ksgxd(void);
>  void sgx_encl_release(struct kref *ref);
>  int sgx_encl_mm_add(struct sgx_encl *encl, struct mm_struct *mm);
> -int sgx_encl_get_backing(struct sgx_encl *encl, unsigned long page_index,
> -			 struct sgx_backing *backing);
> +int sgx_encl_lookup_backing(struct sgx_encl *encl, unsigned long page_index,
> +			    struct sgx_backing *backing);
> +int sgx_encl_alloc_backing(struct sgx_encl *encl, unsigned long page_index,
> +			   struct sgx_backing *backing);
>  void sgx_encl_put_backing(struct sgx_backing *backing);

So this is making the sgx_encl_get_backing() thing static but its
counterpart sgx_encl_put_backing() is not and is still called by other
places.

Perhaps something wrong with the layering or is this on purpose?

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Stable Commits]     [Linux Stable Kernel]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Video &Media]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux