Re: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/boot: Pull up cmdline preparation and early param parsing
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/boot: Pull up cmdline preparation and early param parsing
- From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 12:11:02 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, John Dorminy <jdorminy@xxxxxxxxxx>, tip-bot2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, anjaneya.chagam@xxxxxxxxx, dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Patrick J. Volkerding" <volkerdi@xxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <YbM5yR+Hy+kwmMFU@zn.tnic>
- References: <163697618022.414.12673958553611696646.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> <20211209143810.452527-1-jdorminy@redhat.com> <YbIeYIM6JEBgO3tG@zn.tnic> <50f25412-d616-1cc6-f07f-a29d80b4bd3b@suse.com> <YbIgsO/7oQW9h6wv@zn.tnic> <YbIu55LZKoK3IVaF@kernel.org> <YbIw1nUYJ3KlkjJQ@zn.tnic> <YbM5yR+Hy+kwmMFU@zn.tnic>
On Fri, 10 Dec 2021, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 05:37:42PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Whatever we do, it needs to be tested by all folks on Cc who already
> > reported regressions, i.e., Anjaneya, Hugh, John and Patrick.
>
> Ok, Mike is busy so here are some patches for testing:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bp/bp.git/log/?h=rc4-boot
>
> I'd appreciate it if folks who reported an issue, verify those.
>
> The first two are reverts which should address the issues with mem=
> folks have reported. And the last one should address Anjaneya's issue.
>
> I guess doing it the way as Mike suggested is cleaner/better.
Yes, mem= works fine for me, on both machines, 64-bit and 32-bit,
thanks; but I'm not exercising the troublesome EFI case at all.
Hugh
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Stable Commits]
[Linux Stable Kernel]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Video &Media]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]