Re: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/setup: Call early_reserve_memory() earlier
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/setup: Call early_reserve_memory() earlier
- From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 20:59:40 -0700
- Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <YUlTlsVB7gJUVNT0@zn.tnic>
- References: <20210914094108.22482-1-jgross@suse.com> <163178944634.25758.17304720937855121489.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> <4422257385dbee913eb5270bda5fded7fbb993ab.camel@gmx.de> <YUdwMm9ncgNuuN4f@zn.tnic> <YUkPsjUUtRewyOn3@archlinux-ax161> <YUlTlsVB7gJUVNT0@zn.tnic>
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 05:38:40AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 03:48:18PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > Could auto-latest get updated too so that it does not show up in -next?
> > I just spent a solid chunk of my day bisecting a boot failure on one of
> > my test boxes on -next down to this change, only to find out it was
> > already reported :/
>
> Sorry about that - commit is zapped from tip/master and tip/auto-latest.
Thank you!
> But your effort hasn't been in vain - you have a box which triggers this
> boot issue and I haven't found one yet.
>
> Can you please test on that exact test box whether the new version of
> that commit works?
>
> That one:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210920120421.29276-1-jgross@xxxxxxxx
>
> It would be much appreciated.
Sure thing. I tested both of my test systems and added a tested-by tag
to that thread. Glad to hear it was not in vain :)
Cheers,
Nathan
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Stable Commits]
[Linux Stable Kernel]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Video &Media]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]