Re: [tip: locking/urgent] futex: Handle transient "ownerless" rtmutex state correctly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 07 2020 at 18:05, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-11-06 at 21:26 +0000, tip-bot2 for Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> +		if (unlikely(!newowner)) {
>> +			ret = -EAGAIN;
>                         ^^^
>
> My box just discovered an unnoticed typo.  That 'ret' should read 'err'
> so we goto retry, else fbomb_v2 proggy will trigger gripeage.

Bah. I noticed and wanted to fix it before committing and then
forgot. Fixed now.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Stable Commits]     [Linux Stable Kernel]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Video &Media]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux