On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 05:25:22PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 9:59 PM tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner > <tip-bot2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > The following commit has been merged into the x86/entry branch of tip: > > > > -DO_ERROR(X86_TRAP_DE, SIGFPE, FPE_INTDIV, IP, "divide error", divide_error) > > > > +DEFINE_IDTENTRY(exc_divide_error) > > +{ > > + do_error_trap(regs, 0, "divide_error", X86_TRAP_DE, SIGFPE, > > + FPE_INTDIV, error_get_trap_addr(regs)); > > +} > > I suppose this is a copy-paste typo and was supposed to be "divide > error", right? > Otherwise it changes how kernel oopses look like and breaks syzkaller > crash parsing, and probably of every other kernel testing system that > looks for kernel crashes. > > syzkaller now says just the following for divide errors, without > attribution to function/file/maintainers: > > kernel panic: Fatal exception (3) > FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880ae500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > CR2: 00000000004c9428 CR3: 0000000009e8d000 CR4: 00000000001506e0 > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt > Kernel Offset: disabled > Rebooting in 86400 seconds.. > > I will fix it up in syzkaller. It is now required anyway since this > new crash mode is in git history, so needed for bisection and testing > of older releases. > > It is not the first time kernel crash output changes > intentionally/unintentionally breaking kernel testing. > But I wonder if LKDTM can be turned into actual executable tests that > produce pass/fail and fix crash output for different oopses? > Marco, you implemented some "output tests" for KCSAN. Can that be > extended to other crash types? With some KUnit help? However, I am not > sure about hard panics, they may not play well with unit-testing... A lot of the behavioral tests in LKDTM end up triggering arch-specific logging. I decided to avoid trying to consolidate it in favor of actually getting the test coverage. :) -- Kees Cook
![]() |