The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip: Commit-ID: f611e8cf98ec908b9c2c0da6064a660fc6022487 Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/f611e8cf98ec908b9c2c0da6064a660fc6022487 Author: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> AuthorDate: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 15:42:33 +08:00 Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> CommitterDate: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 12:42:06 +02:00 lockdep: Take read/write status in consideration when generate chainkey Currently, the chainkey of a lock chain is a hash sum of the class_idx of all the held locks, the read/write status are not taken in to consideration while generating the chainkey. This could result into a problem, if we have: P1() { read_lock(B); lock(A); } P2() { lock(A); read_lock(B); } P3() { lock(A); write_lock(B); } , and P1(), P2(), P3() run one by one. And when running P2(), lockdep detects such a lock chain A -> B is not a deadlock, then it's added in the chain cache, and then when running P3(), even if it's a deadlock, we could miss it because of the hit of chain cache. This could be confirmed by self testcase "chain cached mixed R-L/L-W ". To resolve this, we use concept "hlock_id" to generate the chainkey, the hlock_id is a tuple (hlock->class_idx, hlock->read), which fits in a u16 type. With this, the chainkeys are different is the lock sequences have the same locks but different read/write status. Besides, since we use "hlock_id" to generate chainkeys, the chain_hlocks array now store the "hlock_id"s rather than lock_class indexes. Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-15-boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx --- kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index b87766e..cccf4bc 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -372,6 +372,21 @@ static struct hlist_head classhash_table[CLASSHASH_SIZE]; static struct hlist_head chainhash_table[CHAINHASH_SIZE]; /* + * the id of held_lock + */ +static inline u16 hlock_id(struct held_lock *hlock) +{ + BUILD_BUG_ON(MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS + 2 > 16); + + return (hlock->class_idx | (hlock->read << MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS)); +} + +static inline unsigned int chain_hlock_class_idx(u16 hlock_id) +{ + return hlock_id & (MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS - 1); +} + +/* * The hash key of the lock dependency chains is a hash itself too: * it's a hash of all locks taken up to that lock, including that lock. * It's a 64-bit hash, because it's important for the keys to be @@ -3202,7 +3217,10 @@ static inline void free_chain_hlocks(int base, int size) struct lock_class *lock_chain_get_class(struct lock_chain *chain, int i) { - return lock_classes + chain_hlocks[chain->base + i]; + u16 chain_hlock = chain_hlocks[chain->base + i]; + unsigned int class_idx = chain_hlock_class_idx(chain_hlock); + + return lock_classes + class_idx - 1; } /* @@ -3228,12 +3246,12 @@ static inline int get_first_held_lock(struct task_struct *curr, /* * Returns the next chain_key iteration */ -static u64 print_chain_key_iteration(int class_idx, u64 chain_key) +static u64 print_chain_key_iteration(u16 hlock_id, u64 chain_key) { - u64 new_chain_key = iterate_chain_key(chain_key, class_idx); + u64 new_chain_key = iterate_chain_key(chain_key, hlock_id); - printk(" class_idx:%d -> chain_key:%016Lx", - class_idx, + printk(" hlock_id:%d -> chain_key:%016Lx", + (unsigned int)hlock_id, (unsigned long long)new_chain_key); return new_chain_key; } @@ -3250,12 +3268,12 @@ print_chain_keys_held_locks(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *hlock_ne hlock_next->irq_context); for (; i < depth; i++) { hlock = curr->held_locks + i; - chain_key = print_chain_key_iteration(hlock->class_idx, chain_key); + chain_key = print_chain_key_iteration(hlock_id(hlock), chain_key); print_lock(hlock); } - print_chain_key_iteration(hlock_next->class_idx, chain_key); + print_chain_key_iteration(hlock_id(hlock_next), chain_key); print_lock(hlock_next); } @@ -3263,14 +3281,14 @@ static void print_chain_keys_chain(struct lock_chain *chain) { int i; u64 chain_key = INITIAL_CHAIN_KEY; - int class_id; + u16 hlock_id; printk("depth: %u\n", chain->depth); for (i = 0; i < chain->depth; i++) { - class_id = chain_hlocks[chain->base + i]; - chain_key = print_chain_key_iteration(class_id, chain_key); + hlock_id = chain_hlocks[chain->base + i]; + chain_key = print_chain_key_iteration(hlock_id, chain_key); - print_lock_name(lock_classes + class_id); + print_lock_name(lock_classes + chain_hlock_class_idx(hlock_id) - 1); printk("\n"); } } @@ -3319,7 +3337,7 @@ static int check_no_collision(struct task_struct *curr, } for (j = 0; j < chain->depth - 1; j++, i++) { - id = curr->held_locks[i].class_idx; + id = hlock_id(&curr->held_locks[i]); if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(chain_hlocks[chain->base + j] != id)) { print_collision(curr, hlock, chain); @@ -3368,7 +3386,6 @@ static inline int add_chain_cache(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *hlock, u64 chain_key) { - struct lock_class *class = hlock_class(hlock); struct hlist_head *hash_head = chainhashentry(chain_key); struct lock_chain *chain; int i, j; @@ -3411,11 +3428,11 @@ static inline int add_chain_cache(struct task_struct *curr, chain->base = j; for (j = 0; j < chain->depth - 1; j++, i++) { - int lock_id = curr->held_locks[i].class_idx; + int lock_id = hlock_id(curr->held_locks + i); chain_hlocks[chain->base + j] = lock_id; } - chain_hlocks[chain->base + j] = class - lock_classes; + chain_hlocks[chain->base + j] = hlock_id(hlock); hlist_add_head_rcu(&chain->entry, hash_head); debug_atomic_inc(chain_lookup_misses); inc_chains(chain->irq_context); @@ -3602,7 +3619,7 @@ static void check_chain_key(struct task_struct *curr) if (prev_hlock && (prev_hlock->irq_context != hlock->irq_context)) chain_key = INITIAL_CHAIN_KEY; - chain_key = iterate_chain_key(chain_key, hlock->class_idx); + chain_key = iterate_chain_key(chain_key, hlock_id(hlock)); prev_hlock = hlock; } if (chain_key != curr->curr_chain_key) { @@ -4749,7 +4766,7 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, chain_key = INITIAL_CHAIN_KEY; chain_head = 1; } - chain_key = iterate_chain_key(chain_key, class_idx); + chain_key = iterate_chain_key(chain_key, hlock_id(hlock)); if (nest_lock && !__lock_is_held(nest_lock, -1)) { print_lock_nested_lock_not_held(curr, hlock, ip); @@ -5648,7 +5665,7 @@ static void remove_class_from_lock_chain(struct pending_free *pf, int i; for (i = chain->base; i < chain->base + chain->depth; i++) { - if (chain_hlocks[i] != class - lock_classes) + if (chain_hlock_class_idx(chain_hlocks[i]) != class - lock_classes) continue; /* * Each lock class occurs at most once in a lock chain so once
![]() |