Re: [tip: irq/core] irqchip/xilinx: Enable generic irq multi handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-03-30 10:12, Michal Simek wrote:
On 30. 03. 20 11:03, Michal Simek wrote:
On 30. 03. 20 10:45, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 2020-03-30 09:32, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi Thomas and Marc,

On 29. 03. 20 22:26, tip-bot2 for Michal Simek wrote:
The following commit has been merged into the irq/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     a0789993bf8266e62fea6b4613945ba081c71e7d
Gitweb:       
https://git.kernel.org/tip/a0789993bf8266e62fea6b4613945ba081c71e7d
Author:        Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate:    Tue, 17 Mar 2020 18:25:59 +05:30
Committer:     Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitterDate: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 11:52:53

irqchip/xilinx: Enable generic irq multi handler

Register default arch handler via driver instead of directly pointing to xilinx intc controller. This patch makes architecture code more generic.

Driver calls generic domain specific irq handler which does the most of things self. Also get rid of concurrent_irq counting which hasn't been
exported anywhere.
Based on this loop was also optimized by using do/while loop instead of
goto loop.

Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Asserhall <stefan.asserhall@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200317125600.15913-4-mubin.usman.sayyed@xxxxxxxxxx

---
 arch/microblaze/Kconfig           |  2 ++-
 arch/microblaze/include/asm/irq.h |  3 +---
 arch/microblaze/kernel/irq.c      | 21 +-------------------
 drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-------------
 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/microblaze/Kconfig b/arch/microblaze/Kconfig
index 6a331bd..242f58e 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/microblaze/Kconfig
@@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ config MICROBLAZE
     select CPU_NO_EFFICIENT_FFS
     select MMU_GATHER_NO_RANGE if MMU
     select SPARSE_IRQ
+    select GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER
+    select HANDLE_DOMAIN_IRQ

 # Endianness selection
 choice
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/irq.h
b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/irq.h
index eac2fb4..5166f08 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/irq.h
+++ b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/irq.h
@@ -14,7 +14,4 @@
 struct pt_regs;
 extern void do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs);

-/* should be defined in each interrupt controller driver */
-extern unsigned int xintc_get_irq(void);
-
 #endif /* _ASM_MICROBLAZE_IRQ_H */
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/kernel/irq.c b/arch/microblaze/kernel/irq.c
index 903dad8..0b37dde 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/microblaze/kernel/irq.c
@@ -20,29 +20,10 @@
 #include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/of_irq.h>

-static u32 concurrent_irq;
-
 void __irq_entry do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-    unsigned int irq;
-    struct pt_regs *old_regs = set_irq_regs(regs);
     trace_hardirqs_off();
-
-    irq_enter();
-    irq = xintc_get_irq();
-next_irq:
-    BUG_ON(!irq);
-    generic_handle_irq(irq);
-
-    irq = xintc_get_irq();
-    if (irq != -1U) {
-        pr_debug("next irq: %d\n", irq);
-        ++concurrent_irq;
-        goto next_irq;
-    }
-
-    irq_exit();
-    set_irq_regs(old_regs);
+    handle_arch_irq(regs);
     trace_hardirqs_on();
 }

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c
b/drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c
index 1d3d273..ea74181 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c
@@ -124,20 +124,6 @@ static unsigned int xintc_get_irq_local(struct
xintc_irq_chip *irqc)
     return irq;
 }

-unsigned int xintc_get_irq(void)
-{
-    unsigned int irq = -1;
-    u32 hwirq;
-
-    hwirq = xintc_read(primary_intc, IVR);
-    if (hwirq != -1U)
-        irq = irq_find_mapping(primary_intc->root_domain, hwirq);
-
-    pr_debug("irq-xilinx: hwirq=%d, irq=%d\n", hwirq, irq);
-
-    return irq;
-}
-

One more thing. We could also get this function back and it will be fine
too. But up2you.

If you leave it up to me, I'll revert the whole series right now.

What I'd expect from you is to tell me exactly what is the minimal
change that keeps it working on both ARM, microblaze and PPC.
If it is a revert, tell me which patches to revert. if it is a patch
on top, send me the fix so that I can queue it now.

        M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Stable Commits]     [Linux Stable Kernel]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Video &Media]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux