Re: [tip: x86/boot] x86/boot/compressed: Remove .eh_frame section from bzImage
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [tip: x86/boot] x86/boot/compressed: Remove .eh_frame section from bzImage
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:16:18 +0100
- Cc: linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@xxxxxxxxx>, x86 <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20200224164129.GA312716@rani.riverdale.lan>
- References: <20200109150218.16544-2-nivedita@alum.mit.edu> <158254422067.28353.10866888120950973607.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> <20200224164129.GA312716@rani.riverdale.lan>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:41:29AM -0500, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> Hi Boris, apologies for the confusion and unnecessary work I've created,
> but I think the preference is to merge the 2-patch series I posted
> yesterday [1] instead of this.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200223193715.83729-1-nivedita@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
What guarantees this would work and we won't hit some corner case or
toolchain configuration this hasn't been tested on?
If that happens, I need to have a state to revert back to, i.e., this
patch, discarding .eh_frame explicitly.
So I'll pick up [1] too, but give people a couple of days - a chance to
complain about. :)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Stable Commits]
[Linux Stable Kernel]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Video &Media]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]