Re: [tip: x86/cleanups] x86/numa: Fix typo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/15/19 4:45 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 04:41:13PM +0800, Cao jin wrote:
>> Sorry for the confusion. I asked my college to send the patch for me
>> because my git send-email has been down for a while,
> 
> Your "git send-email has been down"? What does that even mean?
> 
my send-email always give me the following msg:

Net::SMTP>>> Net::SMTP(3.11)
Net::SMTP>>>   Net::Cmd(3.11)
Net::SMTP>>>     Exporter(5.73)
Net::SMTP>>>   IO::Socket::IP(0.39)
Net::SMTP>>>     IO::Socket(1.39)
Net::SMTP>>>       IO::Handle(1.39)
Net::SMTP=GLOB(0x557db0534920)<<< 220 G08CNEXCHPEKD01.g08.fujitsu.local
Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service ready at Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:49:11 +0800
Net::SMTP=GLOB(0x557db0534920)>>> EHLO TSO.g08.fujitsu.local
Net::SMTP=GLOB(0x557db0534920)<<< 250-G08CNEXCHPEKD01.g08.fujitsu.local
Hello [10.167.226.60]
Net::SMTP=GLOB(0x557db0534920)<<< 250-SIZE
Net::SMTP=GLOB(0x557db0534920)<<< 250-PIPELINING
Net::SMTP=GLOB(0x557db0534920)<<< 250-DSN
Net::SMTP=GLOB(0x557db0534920)<<< 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
Net::SMTP=GLOB(0x557db0534920)<<< 250-STARTTLS
Net::SMTP=GLOB(0x557db0534920)<<< 250-X-ANONYMOUSTLS
Net::SMTP=GLOB(0x557db0534920)<<< 250-AUTH NTLM
Net::SMTP=GLOB(0x557db0534920)<<< 250-X-EXPS GSSAPI NTLM
Net::SMTP=GLOB(0x557db0534920)<<< 250-8BITMIME
Net::SMTP=GLOB(0x557db0534920)<<< 250-BINARYMIME
Net::SMTP=GLOB(0x557db0534920)<<< 250-CHUNKING
Net::SMTP=GLOB(0x557db0534920)<<< 250-XEXCH50
Net::SMTP=GLOB(0x557db0534920)<<< 250-XRDST
Net::SMTP=GLOB(0x557db0534920)<<< 250 XSHADOW
Net::SMTP=GLOB(0x557db0534920)>>> STARTTLS
Net::SMTP=GLOB(0x557db0534920)<<< 220 2.0.0 SMTP server ready
STARTTLS failed! hostname verification failed at
/usr/libexec/git-core/git-send-email line 1515.

But nothing changed in my configuration, several weeks ago, it can
send-email.

> If you do ask your colleague to send patches for you, he needs to add
> his SOB under yours because it shows this way that the patch went
> through him and it is important to know the path a patch took upstream.
> 

Got it, thanks. I thought SOB is more of the responsibility of the patch
content.

>> I guess it is because our mail server is upgrading.
> 
> Well, something's happening because I've received a couple of bounces
> from your mail address in the past weeks.
> 

Yeah, weird, I can receive from & send to you in thunderbird without any
error.

-- 
Sincerely,
Cao jin





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Stable Commits]     [Linux Stable Kernel]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Video &Media]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux