Re: [kbuild-all] [tip: x86/vmware] input/vmmouse: Update the backdoor call with support for new instructions
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [tip: x86/vmware] input/vmmouse: Update the backdoor call with support for new instructions
- From: Philip Li <philip.li@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 14:20:53 +0800
- Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>, kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-input@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx>, x86-ml <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pv-drivers@xxxxxxxxxx, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tip-bot2 for Thomas Hellstrom <tip-bot2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Doug Covelli <dcovelli@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, VMware Graphics <linux-graphics-maintainer@xxxxxxxxxx>, kbuild-all@xxxxxx, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908300802390.1938@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
- References: <156699905611.5321.15444519862547054670.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> <201908292325.aLXyyzEx%lkp@intel.com> <20190829163353.GC2132@zn.tnic> <20190830010349.GD857@intel.com> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908300802390.1938@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 08:06:27AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Philip,
>
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Philip Li wrote:
>
> > > wanna test trees, I'd suggest simply testing TIP's tip/master branch
> > > which gets redone on a daily basis instead of testing patches in the
> > > tip-bot{,2} notification mails.
> >
> > Thanks Boris for the input. Besides the repo monitoring, we also check the patches
> > in mailing lists, and try to apply patch to a suitable base. Do you think we can
> > skip the mailing list of tip-bot{,2}?
>
> As I just explained in a reply to another random build failure caused by this.
>
> tip-bot2 is a notification mechanism to let people know that a particular
> patch has been merged into one of the tip tree branches. These mails are
> also properly threaded most of the time and reply to the patch which was
> sent to the mailing list.
>
> So yes, randomly picking patches from tip-bot2 is not useful at all. The
> mails contain the information to which tip branch the patch has been
> applied, so the only useful information for your bot is to select the
> branch which got the new patches and start testing on that one.
thanks for your patience. I just realize we actually block tip-bot, but
not tip-bot2. I will update the logic to avoid this issue, and we will
keep monitor for a while to fix new issue if any.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Stable Commits]
[Linux Stable Kernel]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Video &Media]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]