Re: [tip:ras/core] RAS/CEC: Rename count_threshold to action_threshold

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 11:06:37AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * tip-bot for Borislav Petkov <tipbot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Commit-ID:  b8b5ca6600dec2a4f1e50ca9d3cf9e1d032870cd
> > Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/b8b5ca6600dec2a4f1e50ca9d3cf9e1d032870cd
> > Author:     Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
> > AuthorDate: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 21:30:11 +0200
> > Committer:  Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
> > CommitDate: Sat, 8 Jun 2019 17:38:17 +0200
> > 
> > RAS/CEC: Rename count_threshold to action_threshold
> > 
> > ... which is the better, more-fitting name anyway.
> > 
> > Tony:
> >  - make action_threshold u64 due to debugfs accessors expecting u64.
> >  - rename the remaining: s/count_threshold/action_threshold/g
> > 
> > Co-developed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> JFYI, the SOB chain is a bit messed up here, the proper chain would be:
> 
>  Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
>  Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
>  Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
> 
> This shows that the patch started out as your effort as a developer, then 
> Tony enhanced it and passed it to you as maintainer.

Actually, I was trying to point out with the tags that I simply included
changes from Tony because they belonged topically together. There was no
passing. I don't think you can express that with our tags properly thus
the free text above it.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Stable Commits]     [Linux Stable Kernel]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Video &Media]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux