Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/core: Make some functions static

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* tip-bot for YueHaibing <tipbot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Commit-ID:  16e671afb70f28eb189136d1395c59dafecd270a
> Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/16e671afb70f28eb189136d1395c59dafecd270a
> Author:     YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>
> AuthorDate: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 22:31:53 +0800
> Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CommitDate: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 14:19:25 +0200
> 
> sched/core: Make some functions static
> 
> Fix these sparse warnings:
> 
>   kernel/sched/core.c:6576:11: warning: symbol 'max_cfs_quota_period' was not declared. Should it be static?
>   kernel/sched/core.c:6577:11: warning: symbol 'min_cfs_quota_period' was not declared. Should it be static?
>   kernel/sched/core.c:6657:5: warning: symbol 'tg_set_cfs_quota' was not declared. Should it be static?
>   kernel/sched/core.c:6670:6: warning: symbol 'tg_get_cfs_quota' was not declared. Should it be static?
>   kernel/sched/core.c:6683:5: warning: symbol 'tg_set_cfs_period' was not declared. Should it be static?
>   kernel/sched/core.c:6693:6: warning: symbol 'tg_get_cfs_period' was not declared. Should it be static?
>   kernel/sched/fair.c:2596:6: warning: symbol 'task_tick_numa' was not declared. Should it be static?

So unless this is somehow version dependent or other changes interfered, 
this patch wasn't tested very well:

 kernel/sched/fair.o: In function `sched_cfs_period_timer':
 fair.c:(.text+0x920c): undefined reference to `max_cfs_quota_period'
 fair.c:(.text+0x9214): undefined reference to `max_cfs_quota_period'

skipping it for now.

Thanks,

	Ingo



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Stable Commits]     [Linux Stable Kernel]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Video &Media]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux