Re: [tip:x86/boot] x86/boot: Early parse RSDP and save it in boot_params
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [tip:x86/boot] x86/boot: Early parse RSDP and save it in boot_params
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 12:04:51 +0100
- Cc: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Lendacky, Thomas" <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, caoj.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <CAKv+Gu9mm-w66ZZrd7WhuD3_iELS5vUJ0-1DtRq1GDjSsDNEVg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20190208215322.GO674@zn.tnic> <20190211002220.GD14948@zn.tnic> <CAKv+Gu-6bxRrn7Ft4cRYzB1Jgca=L_d1u5OU1nUzLe7SBEd=xQ@mail.gmail.com> <20190211095547.GB1651@localhost.localdomain> <CAKv+Gu_r4Vz2BRpRyJ=UsM1r-+CbyP6heggL+qsKKhJ_iTWhFg@mail.gmail.com> <20190211101011.GA5333@localhost.localdomain> <CAKv+Gu-Tv=Wxhp9k_f4q+AZ+Wqc+joXrnpbz7aKD=75ZKp2Xcw@mail.gmail.com> <20190211102426.GA19618@zn.tnic> <20190211104254.GB19618@zn.tnic> <CAKv+Gu9mm-w66ZZrd7WhuD3_iELS5vUJ0-1DtRq1GDjSsDNEVg@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 10:46:18AM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> As I pointed out in my previous reply, systab will be the wrong type
> on 32-bit firmware, it needs to be efi_system_table_32_t
Yeah, that seems to work. It boots now and it says:
[ 0.000000] efi: No EFI runtime due to 32/64-bit mismatch with kernel
Do you think we should mirror that behavoir early too, so that people
don't get any ideas?
Or should we limit that only to the RDSP address computation and
anything else where kernel and EFI bitness mismatch should be disabled?
Thanks Ard!
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Stable Commits]
[Linux Stable Kernel]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Video &Media]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]