Re: [tip:x86/build] x86/um/vdso: Drop implicit common-page-size linker flag
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [tip:x86/build] x86/um/vdso: Drop implicit common-page-size linker flag
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:14:28 +0100
- Cc: bp@xxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, jdike@xxxxxxxxxxx, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <CAKwvOd=OY-qWqxK9gcacKChAEAPqFWyyBbgsQK6-h0zTYTcOgg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20181206191231.192355-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> <20181211180547.GG25994@zn.tnic> <CAKwvOd=OY-qWqxK9gcacKChAEAPqFWyyBbgsQK6-h0zTYTcOgg@mail.gmail.com>
Am Dienstag, 11. Dezember 2018, 20:08:30 CET schrieb Nick Desaulniers:
> > But in this particular case, DKIM is pretty good spam protection
> > mechanism so enabling it is a good idea.
>
> Internal Gmail developers were able to help me verify that SPF was
> setup correctly, but indeed there's no DKIM. This article has more
> info: https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126?hl=en. Richard, I
> don't know if that's a lot of work on your end, but other folks using
> gmail might have the same issue repeatedly with receiving emails from
> your domain otherwise.
Running your own mailserver is already a PITA, so adding a little more
pain does not count in much more.
Thanks for talking to Gmail guys, I'll look into adding DKIM.
Thanks,
//richard
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Stable Commits]
[Linux Stable Kernel]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Video &Media]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]