Commit-ID: 4de1a293a08bdf8ec1530e02163930ac86f80ea2 Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/4de1a293a08bdf8ec1530e02163930ac86f80ea2 Author: Lance Roy <ldr709@xxxxxxxxx> AuthorDate: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 22:38:57 -0700 Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> CommitDate: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 13:19:28 +0200 futex: Replace spin_is_locked() with lockdep lockdep_assert_held() is better suited for checking locking requirements, since it won't get confused when the lock is held by some other task. This is also a step towards possibly removing spin_is_locked(). Signed-off-by: Lance Roy <ldr709@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181003053902.6910-12-ldr709@xxxxxxxxx --- kernel/futex.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c index 11fc3bb456d6..3e2de8fc1891 100644 --- a/kernel/futex.c +++ b/kernel/futex.c @@ -1365,9 +1365,9 @@ static void __unqueue_futex(struct futex_q *q) { struct futex_hash_bucket *hb; - if (WARN_ON_SMP(!q->lock_ptr || !spin_is_locked(q->lock_ptr)) - || WARN_ON(plist_node_empty(&q->list))) + if (WARN_ON_SMP(!q->lock_ptr) || WARN_ON(plist_node_empty(&q->list))) return; + lockdep_assert_held(q->lock_ptr); hb = container_of(q->lock_ptr, struct futex_hash_bucket, lock); plist_del(&q->list, &hb->chain);
![]() |