On 16.03.2018 13:31, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:59:34PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote: >> Hi, >> On 15.03.2018 20:01, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> Subject: perf: Fix sibling iteration >>> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Date: Thu Mar 15 17:36:56 CET 2018 >>> >>> Mark noticed that the change to sibling_list changed some iteration >>> semantics; because previously we used group_list as list entry, >>> sibling events would always have an empty sibling_list. >>> >>> But because we now use sibling_list for both list head and list entry, >>> siblings will report as having siblings. >>> >>> Fix this with a custom for_each_sibling_event() iterator. >>> >>> Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> >>> Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> >>> Fixes: 8343aae66167 ("perf/core: Remove perf_event::group_entry") >>> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >> >> Applied to tip repo and run testing on Fedora 27/x86_64 (client skylake 8 cores): > > There is at least one more known issue with that patch, but neither Mark > nor me could reproduce so far, so we don't know if we're right about the > cause. Please share more information regarding the issue. I am ready to help. Thanks, Alexey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |