Re: [tip:x86/pti] x86/entry/64: Introduce the PUSH_AND_CLEAN_REGS macro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/12/2018 02:36 PM, David Laight wrote:
From: Denys Vlasenko
Sent: 12 February 2018 13:29
...

x86/entry/64: Introduce the PUSH_AND_CLEAN_REGS macro

Those instances where ALLOC_PT_GPREGS_ON_STACK is called just before
SAVE_AND_CLEAR_REGS can trivially be replaced by PUSH_AND_CLEAN_REGS.
This macro uses PUSH instead of MOV and should therefore be faster, at
least on newer CPUs.
...
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180211104949.12992-5-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
   arch/x86/entry/calling.h  | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
   arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S |  6 ++----
   2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/calling.h b/arch/x86/entry/calling.h
index a05cbb8..57b1b87 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/calling.h
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/calling.h
@@ -137,6 +137,42 @@ For 32-bit we have the following conventions - kernel is built with
   	UNWIND_HINT_REGS offset=\offset
   	.endm

+	.macro PUSH_AND_CLEAR_REGS
+	/*
+	 * Push registers and sanitize registers of values that a
+	 * speculation attack might otherwise want to exploit. The
+	 * lower registers are likely clobbered well before they
+	 * could be put to use in a speculative execution gadget.
+	 * Interleave XOR with PUSH for better uop scheduling:
+	 */
+	pushq   %rdi		/* pt_regs->di */
+	pushq   %rsi		/* pt_regs->si */
+	pushq   %rdx		/* pt_regs->dx */
+	pushq   %rcx		/* pt_regs->cx */
+	pushq   %rax		/* pt_regs->ax */
+	pushq   %r8		/* pt_regs->r8 */
+	xorq    %r8, %r8	/* nospec   r8 */

xorq's are slower than xorl's on Silvermont/Knights Landing.
I propose using xorl instead.

Does using movq to copy the first zero to the other registers make
the code any faster?

ISTR mov reg-reg is often implemented as a register rename rather than an
alu operation.

xorl is implemented in register rename as well. Just, for some reason,
xorq did not get the same treatment on those CPUs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Stable Commits]     [Linux Stable Kernel]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Video &Media]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux