Re: [tip:x86/pti] x86/retpoline: Fill return stack buffer on vmexit
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [tip:x86/pti] x86/retpoline: Fill return stack buffer on vmexit
- From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 16:03:18 +0000
- Cc: tim.c.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pjt@xxxxxxxxxx, jikos@xxxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, riel@xxxxxxxxxx, luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, keescook@xxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20180125155110.mw655b7fwgm7qqc7@pd.tnic>
- References: <1515755487-8524-1-git-send-email-dwmw@amazon.co.uk> <tip-117cc7a908c83697b0b737d15ae1eb5943afe35b@git.kernel.org> <20180125120743.ey32gvl5mjam4r2s@pd.tnic> <1516882849.30244.94.camel@infradead.org> <20180125124554.vdx7rrnfrxrzl2ng@pd.tnic> <20180125151024.bidjr26r667vs7h5@treble> <20180125155110.mw655b7fwgm7qqc7@pd.tnic>
On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 16:51 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> > And the seg fault is objtool's way of telling you you need a
> > ANNOTATE_NOSPEC_ALTERNATIVE above the alternative ;-)
>
> Except that it blew up when I did this which doesn't have ALTERNATIVE
> (it's the diff I saved :-))
Yeah, ANNOTATE_NOSPEC_ALTERNATIVE just tells objtool "don't look at the
alternative; you're not going to like it".
If you start putting a __fill_rsb() function out of line somewhere and
only *calling* it from alternatives, then objtool is going to shit
itself when it sees that function, regardless.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Stable Commits]
[Linux Stable Kernel]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Video &Media]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]