[tip:sched/core] sched/cpufreq: Always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Commit-ID:  0fa7d181f1a60149061632266bb432b4b61acdac
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/0fa7d181f1a60149061632266bb432b4b61acdac
Author:     Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 11:23:22 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 12:53:34 +0100

sched/cpufreq: Always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq

No assumption can be made upon the rate at which frequency updates get
triggered, as there are scheduling policies (like SCHED_DEADLINE) which
don't trigger them so frequently.

Remove such assumption from the code, by always considering
SCHED_DEADLINE utilization signal as not stale.

Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Claudio Scordino <claudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: alessio.balsini@xxxxxxx
Cc: bristot@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx
Cc: joelaf@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: morten.rasmussen@xxxxxxx
Cc: patrick.bellasi@xxxxxxx
Cc: rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: tkjos@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: tommaso.cucinotta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171204102325.5110-6-juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 16 ++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index e9e0713..dd062a1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -315,17 +315,21 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shared(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time)
 		s64 delta_ns;
 
 		/*
-		 * If the CPU utilization was last updated before the previous
-		 * frequency update and the time elapsed between the last update
-		 * of the CPU utilization and the last frequency update is long
-		 * enough, don't take the CPU into account as it probably is
-		 * idle now (and clear iowait_boost for it).
+		 * If the CFS CPU utilization was last updated before the
+		 * previous frequency update and the time elapsed between the
+		 * last update of the CPU utilization and the last frequency
+		 * update is long enough, reset iowait_boost and util_cfs, as
+		 * they are now probably stale. However, still consider the
+		 * CPU contribution if it has some DEADLINE utilization
+		 * (util_dl).
 		 */
 		delta_ns = time - j_sg_cpu->last_update;
 		if (delta_ns > TICK_NSEC) {
 			j_sg_cpu->iowait_boost = 0;
 			j_sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending = false;
-			continue;
+			j_sg_cpu->util_cfs = 0;
+			if (j_sg_cpu->util_dl == 0)
+				continue;
 		}
 		if (j_sg_cpu->flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT)
 			return policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Stable Commits]     [Linux Stable Kernel]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Video &Media]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux