Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/isolation: Document the isolcpus= flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:30:59AM -0500, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> Historically cpusets were not used for cpu isolation. They were used to
> restrict applications threads to sets of cpus for performance reasons. And
> we are here dealing with individual processors.

The HPC workloads very much disabled load-balancing across most CPUs. If
you disable "sched_load_balance" the thing creates NULL sched_domains,
the exact thing isolcpus ends up doing.

This is something cpusets have done for a _long_ time, if not from the
very start.

Yes, you can also create smaller sched_domains which is useful for other
cases and you can even mix the lot, by creating a small set of
load-balanced CPUs for the system tasks while giving a bunch of
unbalanced CPUs to your application.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Stable Commits]     [Linux Stable Kernel]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Video &Media]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux