El Fri, May 05, 2017 at 07:50:39PM +0200 Ingo Molnar ha dit: > > * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 01:11:47AM -0700, tip-bot for Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > > > Commit-ID: 121843eb02a6e2fa30aefab64bfe183c97230c75 > > > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/121843eb02a6e2fa30aefab64bfe183c97230c75 > > > Author: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > AuthorDate: Mon, 1 May 2017 15:47:41 -0700 > > > Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > CommitDate: Fri, 5 May 2017 08:31:05 +0200 > > > > > > x86/mm/kaslr: Use the _ASM_MUL macro for multiplication to work around Clang incompatibility > > > > > > The constraint "rm" allows the compiler to put mix_const into memory. > > > When the input operand is a memory location then MUL needs an operand > > > size suffix, since Clang can't infer the multiplication width from the > > > operand. > > > > *sigh*, this is another shining example of how LLVM is a better, faster > > moving compiler? > > Well, I don't like it - but we already have similar patterns to cover some asm > complications so I didn't mind. Apparently Clang is very close to being able to > build a working Linux kernel, right? Indeed, I expect 4.12 (with this patch ...) to build with Clang for a x86 defconfig (with tons of warnings). ARM64 is very close. > In that sense it would be unfair to expect it to not have various legacies, > missing features and quirks - just like the kernel has dozens of GCC related > workarounds. Also my understanding is that this isn't really a clang issue. In the context of this code gcc apparently chooses to use a register for 'mix_const', for memory locations it also needs a suffix. Actually I just tried to build this code from a single C file: void test() { unsigned long raw, random; const unsigned long mix_const = 0x3f39e593UL; asm("MUL %3" : "=a" (random), "=d" (raw) : "a" (random), "rm" (mix_const)); } gcc -c /tmp/test.c /tmp/test.c: Assembler messages: /tmp/test.c:6: Error: no instruction mnemonic suffix given and no register operands; can't size instruction gcc version 4.9.x 20150123 Cheers Matthias -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |