* Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 01:50:27PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > Er.... "Change top bits ... ((47 or 56 [bits] depending on paging mode)"? > > I know that's wrong and that's not what you meant to say, > > but it can be read this way too. "47th" instead of "47" > > would eliminate this reading, but you removed "th". > > > > Spell it out to eliminate any chance of confusion: > > > > Change top bits to match most significant bit (47th or 56th bit > > depending on paging mode) in the address. > > > > ---------------------8<----------------------- > > From 5dec28ba49387ff444e447213b553506e253616d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 14:06:15 +0300 > Subject: [PATCH] x86/asm: Fix comment in return_from_SYSCALL_64 > > On x86-64 __VIRTUAL_MASK_SHIFT depends on paging mode now. > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Could you please integrate this into your series to make sure I apply all the intended+latest bits? Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|