Re: [tip:locking/core] refcount_t: Introduce a special purpose refcount type
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [tip:locking/core] refcount_t: Introduce a special purpose refcount type
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:36:23 +0100
- Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Windsor <dwindsor@xxxxxxxxx>, "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@xxxxxxxxx>, Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@xxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20170213180020.GK6500@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
- References: <tip-f405df5de3170c00e5c54f8b7cf4766044a032ba@git.kernel.org> <20170213143416.GR6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <CAGXu5jJFa9cW-YQtDqyckfiDxJrfd1FOa3eoQAwOrvmtnOeqLA@mail.gmail.com> <20170213180020.GK6500@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > And since size then isn't an issue what so ever anymore, remove the debug
> > > knob and make all WARN()s unconditional.
> >
> > Are you still going to land the x86 WARN_ON improvements?
>
> Yes, once I manage to eke some response out of the relevant arch maintainers on
> the subject ;-)
so I'm enthusiastically in support of it all! Does that count as a response? ;-)
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Stable Commits]
[Linux Stable Kernel]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Video &Media]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]