Re: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Move perf_event.c ............... => x86/events/core.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 9 Feb 2016, tip-bot for Borislav Petkov wrote:

> Commit-ID:  fa9cbf320e996eaa3d219344b6f7013b096cafd9
> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/fa9cbf320e996eaa3d219344b6f7013b096cafd9
> Author:     Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
> AuthorDate: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:09:04 +0100
> Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CommitDate: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 10:23:49 +0100
> 
> perf/x86: Move perf_event.c ............... => x86/events/core.c
> 
> Also, keep the churn at minimum by adjusting the include "perf_event.h"
> when each file gets moved.

I have to admit I've been falling behind on my lkml reading, but is there 
a good reason for moving all these files around?

I'm often using "git blame" to track down when bugs are introduced, and 
it's a big pain trying to do that across file moves like this.  Although 
that's maybe just due to difficiencies in my git usage skills.

Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Stable Commits]     [Linux Stable Kernel]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Video &Media]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux