Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/entry: Restore traditional SYSENTER calling convention
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/entry: Restore traditional SYSENTER calling convention
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 11:28:26 -0800
- Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mingwei Shi <mingwei.shi@xxxxxxxxx>, "Fu, Borun" <borun.fu@xxxxxxxxx>, "Gross, Mark" <mark.gross@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>, Su Tao <tao.su@xxxxxxxxx>, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@xxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Wang, Frank" <frank.wang@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <568ABE76.7030005@zytor.com>
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 10:48 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Linus has frequently stated that if it is something that is critical
> enough for stable, it is critical enough for final. Linus will decide
> if an additional -rc is needed for that reason.
So it would have been good to have it in an -rc, but at the same time
I'm not particularly worried about this one.
It's not like it's complicated, and I'm assuming it got tested and
passed all our current test-cases (which are much more complete than
anything we've ever had historically).
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Stable Commits]
[Linux Stable Kernel]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Video &Media]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
