Re: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Use INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST for cycles: ppp
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Use INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST for cycles: ppp
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 09:50:26 +0100
- Cc: vincent.weaver@xxxxxxxxx, jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, eranian@xxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, acme@xxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20151208053604.GA15632@gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 06:36:04AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> So I checked my NHM box with your latest queue and it now works correctly. Do you
> have any idea what the difference is/was?
Sadly, no clue :/
I went over those patches and cannot find anything that should affect
NHM (or <=SNB in fact).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Stable Commits]
[Linux Stable Kernel]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Video &Media]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
