On 10/8/2015 7:57 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
+ pr_info("x86/mm: Checked W+X mappings: passed, no W+X pages found.\n");Do we really want to issue anything here in the success case? IMO, we should be quiet if the check passes and only scream when something's wrong...
I would like the success message to be there. From an automated testing perspective (for the distro I work on for example), "the test runs and it fails", "the test runs and it passes" and "the test has not run (because of a bug in the code or config file)" are different outcomes, where the first and third are test failures, but without the pr_info at info level, the 2nd and 3rd are indistinguishable. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |