On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 3:56 AM, tip-bot for Wanpeng Li
<tipbot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> + lockdep_unpin_lock(&rq->lock);
> + raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
> + raw_spin_lock(&next->pi_lock);
> + raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
So _if_ this is ever likely to be a performance-critical piece of
code, it might be worth doing
if (!raw_spin_trylock(&next->pi_lock)) {
.. do the above unlock and relock in the right order sequence ..
}
to avoid doing that whole "unlock just to relock in the right order" thing.
That's particularly true in cases where dropping one of the locks can
necessitate re-doing some checks.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|