Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v4] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix "Failed to find blacklist" error on ia64 and ppc64
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v4] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix "Failed to find blacklist" error on ia64 and ppc64
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 15:39:25 +0900
- Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, akataria@xxxxxxxxxx, anil.s.keshavamurthy@xxxxxxxxx, "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki@xxxxxxxxxx>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, yrl.pp-manager.tt@xxxxxxxxxxx, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>, Kevin Hao <haokexin@xxxxxxxxx>, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@xxxxxxxxxx>, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, dl9pf@xxxxxx, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <1404276081.7254.1.camel@concordia>
- Organization: Hitachi, Ltd., Japan
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
(2014/07/02 13:41), Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 11:21 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2014/06/30 20:36), Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 12:14 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>>> Ping? :)
>>>
>>> Yeah sorry. I started looking at this and got dragged into another mess.
>>>
>>> You seem to have duplicated the functionality of arch_deref_entry_point(),
>>> which was also added for kprobes, and for the same reason - ie. because some
>>> arches have strange function pointers. Is there some reason you can't use it?
>>
>> Ah, right! Hmm, it seems some more work to update it. but basically, we can do.
>> BTW, is there any other users who need to access the actual function entry (for
>> kallsyms case)?
>
> Not that I'm aware of. We have had function descriptors on 64-bit powerpc for
> ever, so in theory by now we should have already found any cases where we need
> that sort of wrapper.
OK, then I'll update this patch to use arch_deref_entry_point(), and add additional
patch which update to support PPC64 ABIv2.
Thank you!
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Stable Commits]
[Linux Stable Kernel]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Video &Media]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]