* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 09:07:14PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 06:05:08PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > > So we can as well zap these commits and replace them with the irq_work_on() > > > > conversion (still preparing that). > > > > > > I hear you, but I think Ingo doesn't want to rebase the tree because its > > > public, but maybe he can make an exception.. > > > > Since tip:timers/nohz only contains these commits: > > > > fc1781cc66b1 Merge branch 'timers/nohz-ipi-for-tip-v3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks into timers/nohz > > 72aacf0259bb nohz: Move full nohz kick to its own IPI > > 55d77c215c74 smp: Non busy-waiting IPI queue > > > > we can zap them all, or even keep 55d77c215c74. > > > > Frederic, which one would you prefer? > > I think we can zap them all. But since I'm not yet sure how the new > solution, based on irq work, is going to be received, do you mind if > we just wait for the new solution to be acked by Peterz? > > If that's ok for you, I'll then do a pull request that includes the > solution and zaps the old two commits. It's all isolated to timers/nohz, not mixed up with anything else, so zapping it is easy (I already zapped the second commit) and you can simply use latest -Linus to base your new solution on. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|