* Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 19:26 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 01:46 -0700, tip-bot for Tim Chen wrote: > > > > Commit-ID: 3cf2f34e1a3d4d5ff209d087925cf950e52f4805 > > > > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/3cf2f34e1a3d4d5ff209d087925cf950e52f4805 > > > > Author: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > AuthorDate: Fri, 2 May 2014 12:53:57 -0700 > > > > Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > CommitDate: Sun, 4 May 2014 20:34:26 +0200 > > > > > > > > > > Ingo, > > > > > > Can you pick up this version of the patch instead. I've updated the > > > comments to reflect all cases for which the rwsem's count is less > > > than WAITING_BIAS, as Peter has pointed out. > > > > Please send a delta patch against the one I applied - and also the > > state diagram suggestion with Peter, once it's clear what form it > > should take. I've yet to see a state diagram that was inferior to > > equivalent textual description - is this case an exception to that? > > > > Ingo, > > The delta patch is included below. Thinking a bit more, > the state diagram approach is not necessarily less verbose > because the state is a tuple (count, wait queue state). > After enumerating the states, we may wind up with very similar > to what I have. Could we at least try with one diagram and see how it goes? Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|