On 2014/4/7 2:40, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > No question. The question at hand is if we should do it after all other > non-terminal (BIOS, triple) methods have been tried. > The reboot sequence before the change is: (1) ACPI (2) KEYBOARD (3) ACPI (4) KEYBOARD (5) TRIPLE The reboot sequence after the change is: (1) ACPI (2) KEYBOARD (3) ACPI (4) KEYBOARD (ADD_1) EFI (ADD_2) CF9 (ADD_3) BIOS (5) TRIPLE Steven's machine exactly hit (5), while CF9 hangs, so we encountered this regression. EFI is no question. So, Is everybody okay with the following sequence? (1) ACPI (2) KEYBOARD (3) ACPI (4) KEYBOARD (ADD_1) EFI (5) TRIPLE (ADD_2) CF9 (ADD_3) BIOS Thanks, -Aubrey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|