On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> 'Breaks a box' is more than enough justification to revert a patch...
Indeed. That's especially true when "breaks a box" was found within a
day of the patch being merged.
The default thinking should be: "If we found _one_ box that broke
during the merge window, that probably means that there are at least
ten thousand boxes that would break if the change actually hit a major
distribution kernel".
Yes, developer boxes are sometimes "special". But the fact is, I doubt
that's the case. Not when this kind of breakage (oops, reboot doesn't
work) is actually not all that unusual. The quirk entries we have for
it are *not* developer boxes.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|