On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:01:21AM +0000, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:27:45AM -0700, tip-bot for Jean Pihet wrote: > > > Commit-ID: 1acfb01a43db9d8cde2d4c1d51746bae0b46b06b > > > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/1acfb01a43db9d8cde2d4c1d51746bae0b46b06b > > > Author: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > AuthorDate: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 19:18:27 +0100 > > > Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > CommitDate: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:45:28 +0100 > > > > > > ARM64, perf: Add support for perf registers API > > > > > > This patch implements the functions required for the perf > > > registers API, allowing the perf tool to interface kernel > > > register dumps with libunwind in order to provide userspace > > > backtracing. Compat mode is also supported. > > > > > > Only the general purpose user space registers are exported, > > > i.e.: PERF_REG_ARM_X0, > > > ... > > > PERF_REG_ARM_X28, > > > PERF_REG_ARM_FP, > > > PERF_REG_ARM_LR, > > > PERF_REG_ARM_SP, > > > PERF_REG_ARM_PC > > > and not the PERF_REG_ARM_V* registers. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Arnaldo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: patches@xxxxxxxxxx > > > Cc: linaro-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391451509-31265-2-git-send-email-jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxx > > > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 2 ++ > > > arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h | 1 + > > > arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild | 1 + > > > arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 1 + > > > arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 6 files changed, 89 insertions(+) > > > > As I replied to Jean yesterday, I merged the arch/arm64 patches already > > in the arm64 tree. Is it late to drop them from tip (and avoid potential > > conflicts)? > > > > But please take the perf tools patch (tools/perf/arch/arm64/...). > > Well, I merged them so that the tooling bits can be tested on top of > that and merged as well. That's why I asked if I should take the tooling bits but Will objected ;). > Anyway, I dropped them, they were still the tail of tip:perf/core. Thanks. I assume you still take the tooling patch? -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|