On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 08:24:20AM -0700, Jason Low wrote: > On Tue, 2014-03-11 at 05:41 -0700, tip-bot for Jason Low wrote: > > > diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c > > index e6d646b..82dad2c 100644 > > --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c > > +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c > > @@ -403,9 +403,9 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, > > if (!mutex_can_spin_on_owner(lock)) > > goto slowpath; > > > > + mcs_spin_lock(&lock->mcs_lock, &node); > > for (;;) { > > struct task_struct *owner; > > - struct mcs_spinlock node; > > Hi Peter, Ingo, > > The "struct mcs_spinlock node" still needs to be moved to the beginning > of __mutex_lock_common() right? Crud; I thought I fixed that since you pointed that out the last time. Anyway; later patches make the argument go away, so its a bisect fail at worst, not sure that's worth fixing at this point :/ sorry about that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html