Commit-ID: 495163420ab5398c84af96ca3eae2c6aa4a140da
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/495163420ab5398c84af96ca3eae2c6aa4a140da
Author: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:24:27 +0100
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 21:27:10 +0100
sched/core: Make dl_b->lock IRQ safe
Fix this lockdep warning:
[ 44.804600] =========================================================
[ 44.805746] [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
[ 44.805746] 3.14.0-rc2-test+ #14 Not tainted
[ 44.805746] ---------------------------------------------------------
[ 44.805746] bash/3674 just changed the state of lock:
[ 44.805746] (&dl_b->lock){+.....}, at: [<ffffffff8106ad15>] sched_rt_handler+0x132/0x248
[ 44.805746] but this lock was taken by another, HARDIRQ-safe lock in the past:
[ 44.805746] (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}
and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.
[ 44.805746]
[ 44.805746] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 44.805746] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
[ 44.805746]
[ 44.805746] CPU0 CPU1
[ 44.805746] ---- ----
[ 44.805746] lock(&dl_b->lock);
[ 44.805746] local_irq_disable();
[ 44.805746] lock(&rq->lock);
[ 44.805746] lock(&dl_b->lock);
[ 44.805746] <Interrupt>
[ 44.805746] lock(&rq->lock);
by making dl_b->lock acquiring always IRQ safe.
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1392107067-19907-3-git-send-email-juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 98d33c1..33d030a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -7422,6 +7422,7 @@ static int sched_dl_global_constraints(void)
u64 period = global_rt_period();
u64 new_bw = to_ratio(period, runtime);
int cpu, ret = 0;
+ unsigned long flags;
/*
* Here we want to check the bandwidth not being set to some
@@ -7435,10 +7436,10 @@ static int sched_dl_global_constraints(void)
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct dl_bw *dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
- raw_spin_lock(&dl_b->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
if (new_bw < dl_b->total_bw)
ret = -EBUSY;
- raw_spin_unlock(&dl_b->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
if (ret)
break;
@@ -7451,6 +7452,7 @@ static void sched_dl_do_global(void)
{
u64 new_bw = -1;
int cpu;
+ unsigned long flags;
def_dl_bandwidth.dl_period = global_rt_period();
def_dl_bandwidth.dl_runtime = global_rt_runtime();
@@ -7464,9 +7466,9 @@ static void sched_dl_do_global(void)
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct dl_bw *dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
- raw_spin_lock(&dl_b->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
dl_b->bw = new_bw;
- raw_spin_unlock(&dl_b->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
}
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|